{"id":29389,"date":"2025-09-09T06:55:22","date_gmt":"2025-09-09T10:55:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/design-providers.com\/rise\/house-committee-releases-image-of-sickening-birthday-note-reportedly-from-trump-to-epstein-us-politics-live-us-news\/"},"modified":"2025-09-09T06:55:22","modified_gmt":"2025-09-09T10:55:22","slug":"house-committee-releases-image-of-sickening-birthday-note-reportedly-from-trump-to-epstein-us-politics-live-us-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/design-providers.com\/rise\/house-committee-releases-image-of-sickening-birthday-note-reportedly-from-trump-to-epstein-us-politics-live-us-news\/","title":{"rendered":"House committee releases image of \u2018sickening\u2019 birthday note reportedly from Trump to Epstein \u2013 US politics live | US news"},"content":{"rendered":"

\n
<\/p>\n

Key events<\/p>\n

<\/span>Show key events only<\/p>\n

Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Boston mayor Michelle Wu, the city\u2019s first Asian and female leader, is expected to take a critical step to securing a second term when voters on Tuesday narrow the field to the top two candidates.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The expectation is that Wu will face against nonprofit leader Josh Kraft, son of Patriots owner Robert Kraft, AP reports. Two other candidates, Robert Cappucci and Domingos DaRosa, are also running. Cappucci is a military veteran and former district school committee member while DaRosa is a community activist.<\/p>\n

For months, Wu has maintained a double-digit lead over Kraft, despite him spending millions of dollars of his own money on his campaign. Wu has been bolstered in part by her defense of the city against attacks from the Trump administration. Both are Democrats, and the party has occupied City Hall for the past century, though the position is nonpartisan.<\/p>\n

Members of president Donald Trump\u2019s administration have accused the city of not doing enough to crack down on illegal immigration and threatened a surge in arrests.<\/p>\n

Boston is commonly known as a sanctuary city, which limits cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Wu has repeatedly said she wants it to be a welcoming place for immigrants.<\/p>\n

Share<\/p>\n

Court rejects Trump\u2019s attempt to overturn E Jean Carroll\u2019s $83m verdict<\/h2>\n

Sam Levine<\/span><\/p>\n

Donald Trump now cannot claim presidential immunity to get off the hook from paying $83.3m in damages to the writer E Jean Carroll, a federal appeals court ruled <\/a>on Monday, upholding a jury\u2019s 2024 award against the president for defamation.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Trump\u2019s lawyers had pointed to the supreme court\u2019s ruling last year saying the president has immunity for official acts to argue that the damages should be overturned. A three-judge panel for the US court of appeals for the second circuit, rejected that argument.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe jury\u2019s duly rendered damages awards were reasonable in light of the extraordinary and egregious facts of this case,\u201d the judges wrote in their unanimous opinion. The panel consisted of judges Denny Chin, an appointee of Barack Obama, as well as Sarah AL Merriam and Maria Ara\u00fajo Kahn, both appointees of Joe Biden. Their decision was unanimous.<\/p>\n

At an earlier stage in the case, they also concluded Trump had waived his right to argue presidential immunity because he had not raised it earlier.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe conclude that Trump has failed to identify any grounds that would warrant reconsidering our prior holding on presidential immunity,\u201d the panel wrote. \u201cA case involving the criminal prosecution of a former President, did not alter the prevailing law on whether presidential immunity can be waived.\u201d Justin Smith, a lawyer for Trump, had argued that presidential immunity is \u201cnot waivable\u201d, according to Politico<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Neither the White House nor Trump\u2019s personal lawyers in the case immediately responded to requests for comment. The second circuit on 13 June upheld Carroll\u2019s separate $5m jury verdict against Trump in May 2023 for a similar defamation and for sexual assault.<\/p>\n

ShareJamie Grierson<\/span><\/p>\n

Donald Trump\u2019s second state visit to the UK will see a big policing operation led by drones in the airspace over Windsor, police have said.<\/strong><\/p>\n

King Charles is to host the US president and his wife, Melania Trump, at Windsor Castle from 17 to 19 September, where they will be entertained with a ceremonial welcome and state banquet.<\/p>\n

A round-the-clock policing operation will be in place in the Berkshire town during the event, with a temporary order restricting the airspace from 16 September \u2013 when the state visit rehearsal is to take place \u2013 until 18 September.<\/p>\n

This means non-police drones and smaller aircraft cannot fly through the protected area, Thames Valley police officers said on Monday during a drone-flying demonstration at the force\u2019s training centre in Sulhamstead, Berkshire.<\/p>\n

The Stop Trump Coalition is to stage a mass demonstration in central London on the first day of the trip, with a further protest planned near Windsor Castle.<\/p>\n

Share<\/p>\n

US immigration officers ramp up sweeps in LA after raid restrictions are lifted<\/h2>\n

Johana Bhuiyan<\/span><\/p>\n

US immigration officers are ramping up immigration sweeps in Los Angeles again after the supreme court reversed a temporary restraining order that banned the Trump administration from stopping people solely based on their race, language or job.<\/strong><\/p>\n

In a post on Twitter\/X<\/a>, Greg Bovino, the head of US border patrol in Los Angeles, called the temporary restraining order \u201cvery poorly\u201d written and \u201cthe worst\u201d he\u2019s ever seen. He also said that border patrol would be starting operations back up again today.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are going hard in Los Angeles today and are hitting a location as I write this,\u201d Bovino wrote.<\/p>\n

Immigration officers were forced to pause their sweeping immigration raids after advocacy groups sued the Trump administration for systemically racially profiling brown-skinned people. US district judge in Los Angeles Maame E Frimpong granted the groups a temporary restraining order after finding a \u201cmountain of evidence\u201d that the immigration enforcement tactics were violating the constitution.<\/p>\n

But the supreme court ruled 6-3 to lift those restrictions on Monday. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who voted to approve the stay on the order, wrote that the Immigration and Nationality Act allows immigration officers to \u201cinterrogate any alien or person believed to be an alien as to his right to be or to remain in the United States\u201d. While \u201cethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion\u201d it can be used as a \u201crelevant\u201d factor, he wrote.<\/p>\n

Share<\/p>\n

House committee releases image of ‘sickening’ Trump birthday note to Epstein<\/h2>\n

Hello and welcome to the US politics live blog. I\u2019m Tom Ambrose and I will be bringing you all the latest news lines over the next few hours.<\/p>\n

We start with news that House Democrats on Monday released an image<\/a> of a sexually suggestive letter and drawing that appears to bear the signature of Donald Trump<\/strong>, the very same note the president had denied writing after reports of its existence were published earlier this year in the Wall Street Journal.<\/p>\n

The letter, described as \u201csickening\u201d by one representative, was turned over by lawyers for disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein\u2019s estate in response to a subpoena from the House oversight committee, and was included in a set of notes sent to the convicted sex offender for his 50th birthday.<\/p>\n

The image showed a letter that in effect comported with a description in the Journal\u2019s report from July. Inside the sketch of a woman\u2019s torso, the note depicts an imagined conversation between Trump and Epstein, with what appeared to be Trump\u2019s signature below.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe oversight committee has secured the infamous \u2018Birthday Book\u2019 that contains a note from President Trump that he has said does not exist,\u201d Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the panel, said in a statement. \u201cIt\u2019s time for the president to tell us the truth about what he knew and release all the Epstein files.\u201d<\/p>\n

The White House did not immediately comment on the letter, but officials sought to discredit the note. Deputy chief of staff for communications, Taylor Budowich, suggested in an X post carrying a different version of Trump\u2019s signature that the letter or the signature had been falsified.<\/p>\n

\u201cTime for news corp to open that check book, it\u2019s not his signature. DEFAMATION!\u201d Budowich wrote, referencing the defamation suit that Trump filed against News Corp, the parent company of the Journal, over its original story.<\/p>\n

Maryland representative Jamie Raskin called the letter \u201csickening\u201d and called for the full Epstein files to be released. Posting on X<\/a>, he said:<\/p>\n

House Democrats fought to bring this sickening letter into the light while Trump and MAGA mouthpieces assured us it did not exist. Trump even sued the Wall Street Journal for reporting on it!<\/p>\n

We can\u2019t trust a word MAGA says. Release the full Epstein file NOW!<\/p>\n

Read the full story here:<\/p>\n

In other developments:<\/p>\n